Main Menu

My Account
Online Free Samples
   Free sample   Software development assignment issues associated with microservices architecture

Software Development Assignment: Issues Associated with Microservices Architecture


Task: Task Instructions:
Write a 1500-word report on software development assignment focused on the specific challenges and issues that arise owing to the use of microservices architecture as a software development philosophy. Identify and include risk mitigation strategies that can be applied to minimise privacy and security risk in microservices-architected environments.


A: Key areas of research

The critical research areas in this software development assignment involve components like the benefits and features of these services and how these software applications can be used to deliver standalone tasks (Jamshidi et al., 2018). Every one of these administrations is constructed independently and sent independently, so they run their cycles and speak with the assistance of lightweight APIs.

B: Key concepts to be addressed
The key concepts to be addressed are an essential factor to be taken into consideration. It can help understand the extent to which these software platforms can be used feasibly to develop standalone projects (Di Francesco, Malavolta & Lago, 2017). The important concepts to be addressed is an essential component, and the study would take into consideration, such as highlighting the critical aspects such as the security issues.

C: Content of the report
The report would highlight the key specific issues and challenges associated with developing software and evaluating the cost of implementing the same (Soldani, Tamburri & Van Den Heuvel, 2018). Microservices engineering permits designers to make separate segments of an application through building an application from a mix of little administrations.

A: Issues and challenges in a microservices architecture

Various challenges are encountered by organizations while implementing microservices architecture. A large number of groups build the framework about microservices design leading to a kind of obligation for an administration engineering (SOA), which badly affects commercial middleware items, for example, risk transport administration (ESB) or web principles such as SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and Internet service.

Meanwhile, the SOA experience helps the creation administration find a reason; organizations have pursued this foundation and can also negatively impact. It is also essential for an organization to consider the security issues associated with the same (Gan & Delimitrou, 2018). It has constant innovative improvements encouraging groups to innovate a thought trap that causes more complexity. These frames are subjected to large volumes, which lead to the creation of traffic.

Planning microservices requires making them inside a limited setting. In this way, every microservice ought to explain, exemplify, and characterize a particular obligation. To do this for every commitment or work, engineers, for the most part, associations, utilize an information-driven view when displaying a space (Knoche & Hasselbring, 2018). This methodology raises its test without rationale; the information is absurd. Microservices are frequently sent across multi-cloud conditions, bringing about expanded danger and loss of control and permeability of use segments—bringing about extra weak focuses. Intensifying the test, every microservice speaks with others using different foundation layers, making it considerably harder to test for these weaknesses. Information security inside a microservices-based system is a specific concern (Taibi, Lenarduzzi & Pahl, 2017). Thus, information inside such a structure stays conveyed, making it a precarious exercise to keep up the secrecy, uprightness, and security of client information, and because of its appropriated system, setting up access controls helps in validation of best administrations, which presents a specialized test and expands the assault surface significantly. The testing period of any product advancement lifecycle (SDLC) is progressively perplexing for microservices-based applications. Given the independent idea of every microservice, an organization needs to test singular administrations freely (Bocchiaro et al., 2018). Worsening this intricacy, advancement groups also need to incorporate administrations and their interdependencies in test plans. Customary types of observing may not work for a microservices-based application. The consequence of this crossing results in a tangled way of administrations, and without the fitting observing devices, distinguishing the fundamental reason for an issue becomes a significant issue. Albeit the versatility of microservices is frequently promoted as a benefit, effectively scaling your microservice-based applications is testing. An application is separated into more modest accessible administrations in an ordinary microservices system facilitated and conveyed across isolated workers (Knoche & Hasselbring, 2018). This design requires organizing distinct segments, which is another test, especially when you experience an unexpected spike in application utilization. Organizations need their microservices to be sufficiently tough to withstand inside and outside disappointments. In a microservices-based application, one segment falling flat can influence the whole framework (Gan & Delimitrou, 2018). Thus, the system you use ought to consider adaptation to internal failure for each help to guarantee a plan that forestalls the disappointment of a whole application in case of an individual assistance personal time.

B: Potential privacy issues in a microservice architecture
There are various ways in which security issues are prominent in a microservices architecture. Some of them are as follows:

1: Expansion of surface attack
Since microservices speak with one another so much using APIs free of both mechanical engineering and, in any event, programming language, this makes more assault vectors. More intuitive administrations additionally increment the complete potential places of real disappointment (Soldani, Tamburri & Van Den Heuvel, 2018). This requires keeping DevOps groups and security groups one stride in front of such microservice interferences. When a microservice is separating, it isn't operable. When microservices are not operable, it's not as simple to perceive how they add to security dangers or whether such an issue is essential for a progressing assault in real life.

2: Security issue in the transition of monolithic applications to microservices
Progressing from a solid DevOps climate to a microservices environment is an awkward compromise, best case scenario. However, it is turning into an essential one to remain cutthroat and backing development (Di Francesco, Malavolta & Lago, 2017). Since it turns out to be substantially more hard to keep a microservices arrangement than a solid one, every microservice arrangement may develop from a wide assortment of structures and coding dialects. The bifurcating intricacies of stack backing will impact choices each time new microservices are added to the general mish-mash. Each different language used to make each new microservice affects security by guaranteeing steadiness with the current arrangement.

3: Inefficient, traditional logging
The new DevOps microservices environment is fanned out–way out. Since microservices are dispersed, stateless, and thus essentially autonomous, there will be more logs. The test here in this is that more records take steps to disguise issues as they spring up (Gan & Delimitrou, 2018). With microservices running from various hosts, it gets essential to send logs across those hosts to an isolated, outside, and unified area. For microservices security to be successful, client logging needs to relate occasions across numerous. These conceivably contrasting stages require a higher perspective to see from, free from any single API or administration.

C: Reasons for these issues and method of overcoming the issues
The microservices issues may be prominent due to a variety of reasons. Observing presents another problem of degree with microservices. As new administrations are heaped on the framework, keeping up and arranging observing for them everything is itself a sort of another test (Taibi, Lenarduzzi & Pahl, 2017). Computerization will be required to help to watch every one of those progressions at scale for influenced administrations. Burden adjusting is essential for the security mindfulness that is observing should represent, not simply assaults and unpretentious interruptions. Applications are somehow the bread and butter of microservices groups (Bucchiarone et al., 2018). Programming interface security doesn't just disappear with microservices protection set up. With each extra new help, the standard, worn-out challenge of upkeep and the design of API observing from the API group point of view arises. More outlandish groups will want to screen changes and dangers at scale for all administrations exposed without robotization. The strategy for utilizing demand headers to permit administrations to impart information is standard. This can improve the number of solicitations made.

Some of the most common ways in which microservices architecture risk may be mitigated are as follows:

  • Monitoring and implementing strategies
  • Overcoming communication failures
  • Securing permission from microservices communication
  • Ensuring deployment for multi-cloud and heterogeneous environment

When countless administrations are using this strategy, group coordination should increment and become effective, and itself likewise should get improved. Besides, with more significant quantities of solicitations, designers should have the option to understand the period for handling such demands (Knoche & Hasselbring, 2018). The serialization and deserialization of solicitations to administrations will probably develop and get clumsy without satisfactory devices and strategies set up to watch demands and tie them into a self-ruling security device ready to work at scale.

Associations across enterprises are at different phases of their excursion toward receiving a microservices engineering style. Some have been fruitful in conveying genuine business benefits, while others are as yet testing. While the advantages of microservices engineering like deftness, specific versatility accessibility remain constant, the organization is unnerved by the different imperfect executions of microservices models that have arisen since our underlying interpretation of the theme. Every microservice needs to have full possession of the information it requires. Microservices architecture refers to a single set up style of application with a small group of services used for communication with the clients. They make use of lightweight protocols for messaging and communicating over HTTP.

Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendonça, N. C., Lewis, J., & Tilkov, S. (2018). Microservices: The journey so far and challenges ahead. IEEE Software, 35(3), 24-35. Retrieved from:

Soldani, J., Tamburri, D. A., & Van Den Heuvel, W. J. (2018). The pains and gains of microservices: A Systematic grey literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 146, 215-232. Retrieved from: Microservices_A_Systematic_Grey_Literature_Review/links/5c2f7534a6fdccd6b590dfd2/The-Pains-and- Gains-of-Microservices-A-Systematic-Grey-Literature-Review.pdf

Gan, Y., & Delimitrou, C. (2018). The architectural implications of cloud microservices. IEEE Computer Architecture Letters, 17(2), 155-158. Retrieved from: Knoche, H., & Hasselbring, W. (2018). Using microservices for legacy software modernization. IEEE Software, 35(3), 44-49. Retrieved from:

Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., & Pahl, C. (2017). Processes, motivations, and issues for migrating to microservices architectures: An empirical investigation. IEEE Cloud Computing, 4(5), 22-32. Retrieved from: and_Issues_for_Migrating_to_Microservices_Architectures_An_Empirical_Investigation/links/ 5a267e064585155dd421a652/Processes-Motivations-and-Issues-for-Migrating-to-Microservices- Architectures-An-Empirical-Investigation.pdf

Bucchiarone, A., Dragoni, N., Dustdar, S., Larsen, S. T., & Mazzara, M. (2018). From monolithic to microservices: An experience report from the banking domain. Ieee Software, 35(3), 50-55. Retrieved from:

Di Francesco, P., Malavolta, I., & Lago, P. (2017, April). Research on architecting microservices: trends, focus, and potential for industrial adoption. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) (pp. 21-30). IEEE. Retrieved from:


Related Samples

Question Bank

Looking for Your Assignment?

Search Assignment
Plagiarism free Assignment









9/1 Pacific Highway, North Sydney, NSW, 2060
1 Vista Montana, San Jose, CA, 95134