Main Menu

My Account
Online Free Samples
   Free sample   Project management assignment analysing cross river rail project brisbane

Project Management Assignment Analysing Cross River rail project Brisbane


Task: Your task
Individually, you are required to prepare a 1600 word report on project management assignment in which you are to analyse the success and failure factors of a major Australian project by considering its ethical compromises.

Assessment Description
In this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to analyse the organisational factors that promote effective project management. The success and failure factors, along with ethical considerations for each of the 5 IPECC phases, will need to be considered.

Assessment Instructions
Please choose one of the following projects as the basis for your research (For your chosen project you are to focus on the construction and implementation of the project, following the IPECC phases, and not its current operations beyond what is required in closure).

Cross river rail project Brisbane: ( )
National Broadband Network Project: ( The new Royal Adelaide Hospital: ( ) Please note that the above links are provided to give only an initial outline of what the project delivered, and substantial additional research will be required to complete your assessment successfully.
Once you have conducted thorough research about your chosen project, you are then required to prepare 1800 word report in which you are to:

• Analyse in detail both the steps critical for your chosen project’s success and the critical pitfalls that could have led to its failure. Relate the specific success and fail factors to your nominated project and do not just describe a generic theory or simple definitions.
• For each of 5 IPECC stages, you are to analyse the success and failure factors for each of those stages. You are required to analyse at least one success criteria and at least one failure criteria for each stage. If you are unable to identify success or fail criteria for a particular stage, you are required to postulate at least one criterion; but it must be based on sound theory and your knowledge of the case study.

• Integrate the ethical considerations into each of these steps and show how ethical considerations may impact the success or failure of the chosen project.


1. Introduction to the case of project management assignment
Project management is an integral party contributing immensely to success and failure of any project. Through the contribution of project management, it is quite important to bring the pros and cons within the project development idea. It is quite important to plan the project taking all integrated considerations from a long period and that too from beginning. Determining the factors leading to success and failures will be much important so that in the long run any discrepancies can be avoided. Being a project manager, it is quite important to understand the characteristics of the project from the beginning. No doubt, Cross River rail project Brisbane is one of the biggest projects happening in Australia. Thus, it is important to identify the failure factors and success factors that will somehow pose for the development in the project. It is also important to identify the ethical consideration that are leading to the project development.

Making the project analysis will be important to deal with certain changes, and through maintaining the cross validation will obviously make use for better contribution to the success and failure of the project management. Project manager will be looking to bring the changes that will certainly induce better quality from the project. It will be innovating to give the project a new look from every dimension. Moreover, it has been seen that this project is going to have long run future towards economy and also towards the development of the country prospects. It is immensely important being a project management to identify the success rate and failure of the company so that proper distribution of resources will be guided and distributed. Through the contribution of the project management, it is important to contribute more towards the development of the projects and will lead to success and failure rate.

2. Analysis of the success factors

The five phases of the IPECC are mainly showing as initiate, plan, execute, control, close and quality.
During this stage, the venture sanction and a fundamental degree explanation are made. The primer extension articulation will be updated in the arranging stage; however, the task contract is an understanding between the venture support and the undertaking administrator and won't change. An undertaking contract endorsed by the task support allows to push forward to the following stage (De Vries, 2020). The data contained in an undertaking sanction will change contingent upon the association and the size of the task, however commonplace data incorporates: Success factors can be

• Venture depiction
• Targets
• Assets
• Layout of undeniable level advances and achievements
• Jobs and Obligations.

A correspondence plan diagrams the who, what, why, where, when, how, and to whom of correspondence. This guarantees that everybody is educated and knows their jobs and obligations identified with correspondence. Roles and responsibilities that are associated with the initiate phase of the project management are as follows. Failure factors may be as:

• Choosing the sponsor that will initiate and process the projects.
• Choosing the project manager that will guide the project
• Identification of the stakeholders that will guide to betterment of projects
• Choosing the customer base will be important to deal with delivery of projects. Plan
At this stage, the group makes an undertaking the executives plan for finishing a task that meets the prerequisites and is on schedule and inside spending plan. Utilizing the venture contract as a guide, the group. Success factors can be

• Explains hierarchical and preparing destinations
• Consents to the extent of the program
• Decides systems to move abilities to the work environment
• Subtleties dangers, openings and suppositions
• Decides members section prerequisites, and
• Evaluations expenses, exertion and timetable.

This outcomes in a preparation needs investigation, which can be a long, formal report, or as casual as an email or notice. It is enticing to skirt this progression and move straightforwardly into fostering the preparation, yet without this appraisal, you might wind up with an item that doesn't address the issues of the purchaser (Fernandes et al., 2020).

The undertaking the executives plan is a living record that is worked with consistently and might be re-examined depending on the situation when unexpected occurrences happen, for example, a representative leaving or things not being followed through on schedule. The venture the board plan ought to contain the accompanying segments. Failure factors may be as:

• Degree definition – a full depiction of the venture
• Work breakdown structure (WBS) – depicts all expectations that are important for the venture (report, model, framework, and so on)
• Hazard the board plan – investigation of expected dangers and arranged reactions
• Change the board plan – depicts formal cycle for making changes to the task
• Timetable – Start and finish dates, just as due dates for expectations
• Financial plan – diagrams costs for the undertakings, might be separated by deliverable, incorporates things like staff and hardware
• Staffing plan – number of individuals and their abilities required, dates needs and number of hours to be given to the task
• Correspondence the board plan – recognizes and designs correspondence with partners
• Obtainment plan – assets to be bought, when they will be bought and process for finding and assessing providers

The project manager is answerable for speaking with the partners and checking the task. They ensure colleagues know their obligations and have the right stuff and assets important to meet them. As the inescapable detours happen, they handle them, ideally with the assistance of the danger evaluation plan. Success factors can be

• Foundation
• Access
• Help Work area
• Enlistment and Security
• Coordination

Project management need to track down a harmony between being excessively controlling and being excessively remiss.Failure factors may be as:
• Acknowledge liability
• Request quality work
• Support gradual change
• Embrace neighbourhood variations
• Downplay gatherings
• Utilize legitimate estimations

Controlling the Project
This part is important in the sense that it will obviously control the main part of the project. It has been informative and collaborative that will be somehow pose for the smoothness in the project. Through the project controlling the factors will be informative and will somehow pose for the distribution of the projects. Moreover, through the controlling part will allow the process to develop that will induce the project. Through the project controlling factors that will deduce the development of the projects (Ika, Söderlund, Munro, and Landoni, 2020). Success factors can be

• Monitoring scope
• Monitoring the schedule
• Monitoring the budget
• Managing sponsor and stakeholder expectations
• Monitoring risk

Failure factors may be as:
• Failure to control the project in a designated manner
• Failure may arise due to improper relocation of resources
• Failure to co-ordinate with project managers
• Failure may arise due to non-use of proper technologies.

Closing the Project
Success factors can be
• Giving the undertaking off to the carrying out association
• Guaranteeing the expectations meet partner necessities
• Shutting the undertaking by:
• Shutting contracts
• Recording examples mastered during the task
• Delivering assets
• Assessing the undertaking system
• Celebrating

Failure factors may be as:
• In closing the project, failure may arise due to improper technologies used
• Failure may arise from accident
• Failure may arise from non-approved closure budgets
This is important for the overall development in the project will certainly make changes in the productibility.

Quality Management
Success factors can be
• Standards
• Guidelines
• Checklists
• Templates
• Procedures
• Process
• User guides
• Example documents
Failure factors may be as:

• Methodology
• Expert review
• Peer review
• Multi-person review
• Walk-through
• Formal inspection
• Standard audit
• Process review

To turn into an able to use both hands association, it isn't simply important to favour investigation and double-dealing exercises freely, yet in addition to incorporate and foster the two exercises all the while. As said over, the relevant methodology of ability to use both hands alludes to the production of a steady workplace that invigorates individuals to incorporate the two exercises. In view of the past thoughts about quality and abuse, and quality and investigation, it tends to be contended that quality administration rehearses in general assist with making this authoritative setting to accomplish ability to use both hands (Ika, Söderlund,and Landoni, 2020). This is on the grounds that quality the board rehearses establish a workplace where it is not difficult to create and associate ground breaking thoughts and information or recombine past information in new ways, through administration responsibility, the association and communication of representatives, collaboration with providers, the attention on clients, and the improvement of cycles and administrations. For instance, worker preparing and collaboration cultivate an authoritative setting of independence and trust that empowers conduct towards information sharing and the age of novel thoughts for investigation and double-dealing.

Additionally, the executive’s obligation to persistent improvement works with critical thinking processes pointed toward improving cycles and items. This responsibility helps representatives improve, learn and enhance at work, and along these lines one might say that this administration is identified with context-oriented ability to use both hands. In this way, quality administration rehearses favour a learning interaction required to foster the two sorts of exercises. Quality administration rehearses help present request and make schedules that invigorate laborers to pay consideration regarding issues and client needs (double-dealing exercises), and look for inventive arrangements, going past adjusting to guidelines (investigation exercises). As indicated by this past writing audit, the accompanying speculation is proposed:

3. Analysis of the failure factors
It is notable that projects here and there neglect to recognize functional prerequisites across the various changes, capacities, and frameworks. What is clear is that functional resources are not completely incorporated as far as their frameworks' innovation also, against the expanding assumptions for partners necessities, which lead to quality issues at tasks. Among other things, functional disappointment makes harm notoriety and squanders cash all through the frameworks' life. An essential test is the separate manner by which quality issues at project changes are perceived and survived through project the board and the dispersion of abilities during the essential stage. Tasks are rarely assessed to decide what part of the item and administration lead to inside project what's more, functional disappointments. Conventional practices forestall full clarification of the underlying driver. All things considered; disappointments regularly reappear with restricted interorganizational learning. Regularly, functional disappointments are viewed as a person obligation rather than shared by the entire venture group to convey a coordinated and dynamic reaction. Quality issues among projects and tasks can result except if the reasons for such disappointments are alleviated. Staff issues or lacks in administration have agreeing to project the board researchers recently caused disappointment.

4. Ethical considerations

Ethical considerations to initiate the project is to deal with minimum damage. It is important to follow basic guidelines to initiate the project. Ethical considerations to be dealt with proper knowledge of the resources.

Ethical consideration for planning is to somehow follow the rules and regulations. It is important for the Cross River rail project Brisbane to somehow develop the cross examination and develop the planning to somehow pose for the improvement in output.

Ethical consideration for the execution will obviously deal with proper zeal and that will culminate proper outing and proper development for the resource.

Controlling the Project
It is important for the project management team to control the project. This will certainly help the development of better output. It will be highlighting the sense that it will control the project and will boost up the development.

Closing the Project
Ethical consideration will be to involve the technologies in closing the projects. This will obviously endorse Cross River rail project Brisbane to deal with better and effective technologies.

Quality Management
This will be somehow posed for the overall quality management that will somehow build up for the development of management that will mitigate the damages. They will be helpful for the improvement in making better quality management.

5. Conclusion
Choosing the productivity and project management will be important that will somehow pose for the beneficial in dealing with close criteria that will reduce the pressure and tension. The overall payment and structure will somehow pose for the improvement in the process will certainly make better choice. A project manager should remain focus and will entail the situation in dealing with adaption. Majorly the development in the overall situation will be important. This will certainly make better use of the products that will somehow pose for the improvement in making quality changes to the whole procedure and structure.

De Vries, J., 2020. Identifying inventory project management conflicts: Results of an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, p.107620.
Fernandes, G., O'Sullivan, D., Pinto, E.B., Araújo, M. and Machado, R.J., 2020. Value of project management in university–industry R&D collaborations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
Ika, L.A., Söderlund, J., Munro, L.T. and Landoni, P., 2020. Cross-learning between project management and international development: Analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 38(8), pp.548-558.
Layton, M.C., Ostermiller, S.J. and Kynaston, D.J., 2020. Agile project management for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Magano, J., Sousa Silva, C. and Martins, M., 2021. Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management. Sustainability, 13(21), p.12090.
Naji, K., Gunduz, M. and Salat, F., 2020. Assessment of preconstruction factors in sustainable project management performance. Project management assignment Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H., 2020. Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.
Puška, A., Stojanovi, I., Maksimovi, A. and Osmanovi, N., 2020. Evaluation software of project management used measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), pp.89-102.
Sabini, L. and Alderman, N., 2021. The Paradoxical Profession: Project Management and the Contradictory Nature of Sustainable Project Objectives. Project Management Journal, p.87569728211007660.
Thesing, T., Feldmann, C. and Burchardt, M., 2021. Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.746-756.


Related Samples

Question Bank

Looking for Your Assignment?

Search Assignment
Plagiarism free Assignment









9/1 Pacific Highway, North Sydney, NSW, 2060
1 Vista Montana, San Jose, CA, 95134